Contact & Tips

What We Respond To

We're a small team compiling data, not a customer service department. We appreciate relevant, specific communication and will respond to:

• Data corrections: Found outdated pricing, incorrect vendor info, or factual errors? Let us know with specifics.
• Broken links: External references or internal links not working? Send us the page URL and broken link.
• New vendor info: Found a vendor with verified COAs that should be included? Send us their details.
• Study citations: Have a relevant human trial we missed? Send PubMed link and peptide it relates to.
• Legal updates: State laws changed or new FDA/WADA rulings? Send official source link.

What We Don't Respond To

We receive dozens of emails daily. To keep this site running, we ignore:

• Medical advice requests: "Should I use X peptide for Y condition?" → See a doctor, not an information website
• Vendor pitches: "Review our peptides!" → We compile publicly available data; you can't pay for placement
• Affiliate offers: "Partner with us for commission!" → We don't do affiliate marketing. Period.
• Personal protocol questions: "What dose should I use?" → We show data, not personalized advice
• Legal advice: "Can I legally import to my state?" → We provide information, not legal counsel
• Product troubleshooting: "My peptide looks cloudy, is it bad?" → Contact your vendor, not us

How to Contact Us

Email: contact@wildwestpeptides.com

Response time: 3-7 business days for legitimate inquiries. We batch responses to stay efficient.

What to include in your email:

• Specific page URL if reporting an issue with a particular page
• Exact error/correction with source link if claiming something is wrong
• Clear subject line (e.g., "Pricing correction: BPC-157 vendor page" or "Broken link: Legal by State")

Corrections & Updates

We want this data to be accurate. If you spot errors:

Type of Issue	What to Send	We Will...
Pricing error	Page URL + vendor name + current pricing screenshot/link	Verify and update within 1 week
Broken external link	Page URL + which link is broken	Replace or remove within 3-5 days
Factual error (science/legal)	Specific claim + source showing correct info	Review and correct if verified
Vendor no longer exists	Vendor name + evidence site is down/scam	Remove from comparison tables
New relevant study	PubMed link + peptide it relates to	Review for inclusion in evidence tables

Community Input

Much of our community log data comes from aggregating public forum posts. If you have:

• Large sample data from peptide community surveys
• Vendor testing results from independent third-party verification
• Documented legal case outcomes related to peptides

...we're interested. Send details to the email above.

Press & Media

For media inquiries or interview requests related to the peptide industry, research peptide market, or consumer protection in unregulated supplement spaces, email with "MEDIA" in subject line.

Privacy

We don't collect visitor data beyond basic server logs. Emails sent to us are not shared, sold, or used for marketing. We may quote anonymized corrections in site updates (e.g., "A reader noted pricing error on X page") but never with identifying information.

Disclaimer Reminder

We provide information, not recommendations. Nothing on this site constitutes medical, legal, or financial advice. We compile data on research peptides sold "for research use only." Human use of these compounds is your decision and your responsibility. Consult appropriate professionals (doctors, lawyers) for personalized guidance.

Site Navigation

• Home
• About Wild West Peptides
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Vendor Red Flags
• Do Peptides Actually Work?
• Legal Status by State

How We Reported This

The information on this page reflects the editorial desk's review of available primary sources, supplemented by community-submitted reports and independent verification where possible. We do not publish vendor-supplied content. We do not run sponsored placements. We do not accept advertising. Every assessment is generated from source material we have read, samples we have tested, or correspondence we have logged — not from aggregating other publishers' coverage.

Where this page cites a peer-reviewed publication, it is with a PMID identifier sufficient to verify the citation independently. Where it summarizes community-log data, it is from the database described on the community logs page. Where it makes a regulatory claim, it is from the published statute or regulator guidance, not from secondary summaries.

The Standards That Apply Across Every Page

Our editorial standards are not subtle and they are not negotiable. We do not name a vendor as recommended unless we have independently verified at least one of the following: a recent batch-specific independent Certificate of Analysis, a successful test order placed by the editorial desk, or a coherent pattern of submitter reports with documentation. We do not characterize a compound as "effective" unless the available evidence supports that characterization at the level of evidence we apply. We do not characterize a compound as "safe" because absence of evidence of harm is not evidence of safety, and most research peptides have not been studied long enough to establish a meaningful long-term safety profile.

The standard that applies to this entire site: when we are not sure, we say we are not sure. When evidence is weak, we say it is weak. When something is opinion rather than fact, we label it as opinion. The voice of this publication is meant to be confidently uncertain — willing to draw conclusions where evidence permits, and willing to acknowledge limits where it doesn't.

What This Reporting Does Not Replace

Nothing on this site is medical advice, legal advice, financial advice, or any other species of advice that should come from a licensed professional. We are journalists working in a domain that has very few journalists working in it. That gap is what justifies this publication; it does not mean the publication is a substitute for the professional advice the gap should ideally not require.

Any decision about whether to use, acquire, store, or distribute research peptides is yours alone. Any consequence of that decision is yours alone. The information here exists to make those decisions better-informed than they would otherwise be, not to make them on your behalf.

Where To Go From Here

Reading any individual page on this site is a slice of the picture. The full investigation continues across the related desks. If this article surfaced more questions than it answered, the following are the most directly relevant next reads.

• The full 2025 vendor ranking — composite scores with the methodology spelled out.
• The twelve-item red-flag checklist — what to verify before placing any order.
• Evidence audit by compound — what the published literature actually supports.
• Side effects, unfiltered — what researchers report and what is not yet known.
• Legal status by country — jurisdictional differences that matter for ordering.
• The self-experimentation framework — how to evaluate your own results without lying to yourself.